The Supreme Court Justices were all into the sordid details of Anna Nicole Smith’s case. It is a tale of sex, deception, and greed that has many legal twists and turns to boot. They are not expected to rule on the case until June, but they had a lively discussion in court discussing the details of the case. “‘I just want some money from this guy.’ That’s all she’s saying,” Justice David Souter said. “Just give me the money I would have had.” That’s exactly what Anna Nicole has been saying for the last ten years!

I personally think she deserves some serious compensation for having to touch that guy’s wrinkly old penis. I really don’t understand why his son is engaging in posthumous cock-blocking anyway. There’s certainly more than enough money in the bank for all parties to be satisfied. This is a simple case of quid pro quo, money for sex. Whether it was handjobs, blowjobs, or full missionary is something that was between Anna and the old fart. But a deal’s a deal and she should get paid for granting an old man his dying wish.

2 Comments »

  1. His son is just jealous that he couldn’t get in on the Anna Nicole action. I totally think she deserves all that old dead dude’s money.

    #1 by Meerenai — March 1, 2006 @ 5:20 pm

  2. I agree. The son is pissed that when daddy died he tried to hit dat and she wuz like, “Hell no, one old fart is enough!” However, giving her half of the estate seems excessive, $600 million is too much money. However, I would definitely give her $150 million or so for her trouble.

    #2 by Nugget — March 1, 2006 @ 7:33 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

If you Connect with Facebook your email address will not be published.


Enter the anti-spam code displayed above (required)